OLD M-28 over TEN MILE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+46.53477, -89.4304146°32'05" N, 89°25'49" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | OLD M-28 over TEN MILE CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000008516 |
Old structure number: | 66200003000B020 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 7 MI W OF EWEN |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 53.8 ft. [16.4 m] |
Total length: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2011 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 100.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 50 | 100.0 |
November 2015 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 50 | 100.0 |
November 2013 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 100.0 |
October 2011 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Critical | 50 | 40.9 |
November 2009 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Critical | 155 | 25.6 |
October 2007 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Critical | 155 | 25.6 |
October 2005 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Critical | 155 | 25.6 |
December 2003 | Poor | Good | Good | Serious | 155 | 25.6 |
November 2001 | Poor | Good | Good | Serious | 155 | 25.6 |
November 1999 | Poor | Good | Good | Serious | 155 | 25.6 |
November 1997 | Poor | Good | Good | Serious | 155 | 30.9 |
November 1995 | Poor | Good | Good | Serious | 155 | 25.6 |
November 1993 | Poor | Good | Good | Serious | 155 | 26.1 |
October 1991 | Poor | Very Good | Satisfactory | Serious | 155 | 26.1 |