WATERWHEEL COURT over WEST BR BIG CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+44.62321, -84.2784544°37'24" N, 84°16'42" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | WATERWHEEL COURT over WEST BR BIG CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000008669 |
Old structure number: | 68301C00023B010 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | SEC 23-26 BIG CREEK TWP |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Total length: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2010 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 29 [as of 2009] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 72.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Poor | Good | Very Good | Poor | 29 | 72.0 |
October 2017 | Poor | Very Good | Very Good | Poor | 29 | 72.0 |
October 2015 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 29 | 88.0 |
October 2013 | Fair | - | Very Good | Fair | 29 | 88.0 |
October 2011 | Fair | Excellent | Excellent | Fair | 29 | 68.7 |
November 2009 | Fair | - | - | Fair | 114 | 29.4 |
October 2007 | Poor | Fair | Critical | Fair | 114 | 33.5 |
October 2005 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 114 | 46.2 |
October 2003 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 90 | 47.7 |
July 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 94.9 |
April 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 65.3 |
May 1997 | Fair | Good | - | Good | 90 | 64.3 |
May 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 93 | 77.9 |
November 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 93 | 77.9 |
August 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 93 | 89.8 |