SPINOZA DRIVE over ROUGE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.36882, -83.2542342°22'08" N, 83°15'15" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SPINOZA DRIVE over ROUGE RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000012458 |
Old structure number: | 825180801218B01 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | ROUGE PARK |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Total length: | 83.0 ft. [25.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1930 |
Year reconstructed: | 1998 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,317 [as of 2008] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 86.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1317 | 86.2 |
December 2015 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1317 | 86.2 |
December 2013 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1317 | 86.2 |
December 2011 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1317 | 86.3 |
June 2009 | Fair | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | 1317 | 86.3 |
August 2008 | Good | Excellent | Good | Good | 1317 | 88.3 |
September 2006 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 1737 | 81.9 |
August 2004 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 1737 | 82.0 |
July 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 2218 | 82.0 |
September 2000 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 2218 | 79.0 |
July 1998 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 2218 | 79.0 |
September 1996 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Poor | 3662 | 14.7 |
July 1994 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 3662 | 46.7 |
September 1992 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 2453 | 46.9 |
September 1990 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 2453 | 46.9 |