S. 2nd ST (MUN 4) over EAST TWO RIVERS

This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.


+47.80407, -92.28092
47°48'15" N, 92°16'51" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:S. 2nd ST (MUN 4) over EAST TWO RIVERS
Structure number:2180
Location:0.1 MI E OF JCT TH135
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Total length:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:19.4 ft. [5.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1915
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 1975]
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:25.4
Estimated cost of work:$700,000,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2016PoorPoorPoorPoor20025.4
August 2015PoorPoorPoorPoor20025.4
June 2014PoorPoorPoorPoor20018.6
June 2013PoorPoorPoorPoor20018.6
June 2012PoorPoorPoorPoor20018.6
May 2011PoorPoorPoorPoor20018.6
December 2010PoorPoorPoorPoor20018.6
July 2009PoorPoorPoorFair20018.6
December 2008PoorPoorPoorFair20018.6
August 2007PoorPoorPoorFair20018.6
November 2006PoorPoorPoorFair20018.6
November 2005PoorPoorPoorFair20018.6
July 2004PoorFairPoorFair20020.7
August 2003PoorFairPoorFair20020.7
December 2002PoorFairPoorFair20020.7
July 2001PoorFairPoorFair20020.7
March 2000PoorFairPoorFair20020.7
July 1999PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory20021.8
September 1998PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory20021.8
December 1996FairSatisfactoryFairGood20021.9
February 1996FairGoodSatisfactoryGood20035.3
November 1994FairGoodSatisfactoryGood20035.3
May 1993FairGoodSatisfactoryGood20035.3
September 1992FairGoodSatisfactoryGood20035.3
December 1991FairGoodSatisfactoryGood20035.3