TH 960D over US 169
Map
Coordinates:
+44.16994, -94.0050344°10'12" N, 94°00'18" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | TH 960D over US 169 |
Structure number: | 52009 |
Location: | 1.6 MI S OF JCT TH 14 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 73.8 ft. [22.5 m] |
Total length: | 147.6 ft. [45.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 106.3 ft. [32.4 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 18° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1985 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Low slump Concrete [4] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 21,000 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 88.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 21000 | 88.5 |
August 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 21000 | 89.9 |
August 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 21000 | 90.9 |
August 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 27000 | 90.3 |
August 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 27000 | 90.3 |
August 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 27000 | 90.3 |
August 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 27000 | 90.3 |
July 2003 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 19700 | 91.0 |
January 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 13800 | 96.7 |
November 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 15300 | 96.5 |
November 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 13800 | 96.7 |
December 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 13800 | 96.3 |
October 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 13800 | 94.0 |
November 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 13800 | 94.0 |
November 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 13800 | 94.0 |
November 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 20500 | 93.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 308 | 248 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 220 | 110 | 110 | 0 | 0 |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 220 | 0 | 0 | 110 | 110 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 19 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 288 | 288 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 684 | 0 | 684 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 288 | 268 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 15,690 | 15,689 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 11,808 | 11,670 | 138 | 0 | 0 |