TH 149 over STREETS; MISS RVR; RR
Map
Coordinates:
+44.93326, -93.1043344°55'60" N, 93°06'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | TH 149 over STREETS; MISS RVR; RR |
Structure number: | 62090 |
Location: | 0.6 MI S OF JCT TH 5 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway, waterway, and railroad |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 520.0 ft. [158.5 m] |
Total length: | 2769.8 ft. [844.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 54.5 ft. [16.6 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1986 |
Year reconstructed: | 2018 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Low slump Concrete [4] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
Average daily traffic: | 14,000 [as of 2008] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 90.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 14000 | 90.9 |
June 2016 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 14000 | 90.9 |
June 2015 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 14000 | 90.9 |
June 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 14000 | 90.9 |
June 2013 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 14000 | 90.9 |
June 2012 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 14000 | 90.9 |
May 2011 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 14000 | 90.9 |
May 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 14000 | 90.9 |
July 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 18000 | 86.3 |
June 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 18000 | 85.3 |
May 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 18000 | 85.3 |
October 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 18000 | 85.3 |
October 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 18000 | 85.3 |
October 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 16500 | 85.5 |
November 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 16500 | 85.5 |
October 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 16500 | 85.5 |
October 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 16500 | 85.5 |
October 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 16500 | 85.5 |
October 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 14800 | 0.0 |
September 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 13000 | 86.0 |
August 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 13000 | 85.0 |
October 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 13000 | 85.0 |
September 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 15500 | 82.5 |
December 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 16000 | 82.4 |
October 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 16000 | 82.4 |
October 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 15500 | 82.5 |
October 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 15500 | 82.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 9,644 | 4,845 | 4,504 | 295 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 240,276 | 81,711 | 144,165 | 12,000 | 2,400 |
Steel Stringer | linear ft. | 6,640 | 3,766 | 2,614 | 260 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 49,600 | 36,704 | 9,920 | 2,480 | 496 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 175,825 | 175,825 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 106,300 | 106,300 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Superstructure |
Steel Arch | linear ft. | 2,228 | 943 | 1,205 | 80 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 162,701 | 67,854 | 90,153 | 4,487 | 207 |
Steel Main Cable | linear ft. | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Floor Beam | linear ft. | 1,414 | 900 | 454 | 60 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 20,094 | 8,041 | 9,041 | 2,008 | 1,004 |
Steel Gusset Plate | each | 38 | 26 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 120 | 0 | 120 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 20 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 120 | 0 | 120 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 204 | 194 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 60 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 435 | 360 | 75 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 235 | 235 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 640 | 315 | 315 | 0 | 10 |
Assembly with Seal | each | 153 | 153 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Fixed Bearing | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pot Bearing | each | 43 | 37 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Disk Bearing | each | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 5,672 | 5,672 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 50,576 | 50,570 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 10,978 | 10,978 | 0 | 0 | 0 |