TH 7 over CHIPPEWA RIVER

This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.

Map

Coordinates:
+44.94036, -95.73081
44°56'25" N, 95°43'51" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	TH 7 over CHIPPEWA RIVER
Structure number:	9114
Location:	0.1 MI NW OF JCT TH 59
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	149.9 ft. `[45.7 m]`
Total length:	182.1 ft. `[55.5 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	32.8 ft. `[10.0 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	16.1 ft. `[4.9 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1932
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Low slump Concrete `[4]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	2,200 `[as of 2008]`
Truck traffic:	12% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	43.7
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$1,467,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
June 2013	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	2200	43.7
June 2012	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	2200	43.7
September 2011	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	2200	43.7
September 2010	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	2200	43.5
September 2009	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	2200	43.5
September 2008	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	1850	44.6
August 2007	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	1850	63.6
December 2006	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1850	75.7
October 2005	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1850	75.7
September 2004	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2000	75.7
December 2003	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2000	75.7
October 2002	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1750	75.7
December 2001	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1750	70.7
November 2000	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1750	75.4
November 1999	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1750	75.4
September 1998	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2050	74.4
October 1997	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2050	72.0
October 1996	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1600	73.0
December 1995	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1600	70.0
October 1994	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	1600	70.0
September 1993	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	1600	70.0
October 1992	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	1800	70.9
November 1991	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	1800	70.9