IS 29 S over RT T
Map
Coordinates:
+39.90367, -94.8848739°54'13" N, 94°53'06" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | IS 29 S over RT T |
Structure number: | 1065 |
Location: | S 25 T 59 N R 35 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Length of largest span: | 44.9 ft. [13.7 m] |
Total length: | 105.0 ft. [32.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 37.4 ft. [11.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Year reconstructed: | 1991 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Epoxy Overlay [5] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 12,403 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 34% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 94.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 12403 | 94.4 |
September 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 9539 | 94.5 |
September 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 10860 | 94.5 |
October 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 10893 | 94.5 |
October 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 7944 | 94.6 |
November 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 8989 | 94.6 |
November 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 8241 | 94.6 |
November 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8065 | 93.6 |
November 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 12044 | 93.4 |
November 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 11762 | 93.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 106 | 106 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 210 | 60 | 50 | 100 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 210 | 200 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 4,200 | 3,600 | 300 | 300 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 3,938 | 0 | 2,363 | 1,575 | 0 |