COUNTY RD 80 over WHITE CLOUD CR
Map
Coordinates:
+40.12773, -94.8529140°07'40" N, 94°51'10" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY RD 80 over WHITE CLOUD CR |
Structure number: | 14954 |
Old structure number: | 08000091 002 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 33 T 62 N R 35 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
Total length: | 90.9 ft. [27.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1930 |
Year reconstructed: | 1988 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 15 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 47.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $402,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 15 | 47.0 |
January 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 15 | 47.0 |
March 2014 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 15 | 47.0 |
February 2012 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 15 | 52.0 |
February 2010 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 15 | 52.0 |
February 2008 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 15 | 52.0 |
January 2006 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 15 | 52.0 |
February 2004 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 15 | 52.0 |
January 2002 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 15 | 52.0 |
December 1999 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 15 | 52.0 |
March 1998 | Poor | Very Good | Serious | Good | 15 | 41.0 |
January 1996 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 15 | 45.3 |
February 1994 | Good | Excellent | Good | Excellent | 15 | 42.3 |
February 1992 | Good | Excellent | Good | Excellent | 15 | 42.3 |