Share: 
PATTERSON CRD 293 over LIT LEAD CK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.10307, -91.21406
39°06'11" N, 91°12'51" W
+39.10307, -91.21406
39°06'11" N, 91°12'51" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | PATTERSON CRD 293 over LIT LEAD CK |
| Structure number: | 15043 |
| Old structure number: | 0830006 057 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | S 14 T 50 N R 3 W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
| Total length: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1995 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 35 [as of 2017] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 99.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 35 | 99.0 |
| December 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 35 | 99.0 |
| December 2014 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 35 | 99.0 |
| November 2012 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 35 | 99.0 |
| December 2010 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 35 | 99.0 |
| December 2008 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 35 | 99.0 |
| November 2006 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 35 | 99.0 |
| October 2004 | Good | Excellent | Good | Good | 50 | 99.0 |
| October 2002 | Fair | Excellent | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 99.0 |
| October 2000 | Fair | Excellent | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 99.0 |
| October 1998 | Fair | Excellent | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 99.0 |
| February 1997 | Good | Excellent | Good | Good | 50 | 99.0 |
| November 1995 | Good | Excellent | Good | Excellent | 50 | 99.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1275816
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1275816