MO 90 E over TRENT CR


+36.57605, -94.08496
36°34'34" N, 94°05'06" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:MO 90 E over TRENT CR
Structure number:1519
Old structure number:A1828 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 32 T 22 N R 29 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Total length:115.2 ft. [35.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:461 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:13% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:56.3
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$511,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
October 2018PoorPoorFairGood46156.3
October 2016PoorPoorFairVery Good45756.4
October 2014PoorPoorGoodVery Good37567.3
November 2012FairFairGoodVery Good37669.4
December 2011FairFairGoodVery Good37669.4
January 2011PoorPoorGoodVery Good40067.2
November 2009PoorPoorGoodVery Good36867.4
January 2009PoorPoorGoodVery Good36867.4
October 2007PoorPoorVery GoodVery Good40967.1
January 2007PoorPoorVery GoodVery Good40767.2
January 2006PoorPoorVery GoodVery Good40767.2
October 2004GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good72068.6
November 2002GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good73468.6
January 2002GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good41870.2
October 2000GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good39770.3
November 1999GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good46969.9
October 1998GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good46969.9
October 1997GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good46969.9
November 1995GoodGoodGoodVery Good42470.7
January 1995GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good40570.8
December 1993GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good37970.9
September 1992GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good37970.9
November 1991GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good35771.0