Share:

LINCOLN RD over MID BR OF SQUAW CR

Map

Coordinates:
+40.21016, -95.21968
40°12'37" N, 95°13'11" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LINCOLN RD over MID BR OF SQUAW CR
Structure number:16023
Old structure number:1070005 044 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 6 T 62 N R 38 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:79.1 ft. [24.1 m]
Total length:99.1 ft. [30.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:10 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:25.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$426,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
November 2017FairGoodFairSatisfactory1025.0
February 2016FairVery GoodFairSatisfactory1025.0
February 2014FairFairFairSatisfactory1024.0
February 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1029.7
February 2010FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1029.7
January 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1029.7
January 2006FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1029.7
January 2004FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1029.7
December 2001FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1029.7
January 2000FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1029.7
March 1998FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood1029.7
February 1990FairGoodSatisfactoryGood1029.7