Share:

COUNTY RD 1230 over SUGAR CR

Map

Coordinates:
+39.45456, -92.52283
39°27'16" N, 92°31'22" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:COUNTY RD 1230 over SUGAR CR
Structure number:18111
Old structure number:173R025 088 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 19 T 54 N R 14 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Total length:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:17.7 ft. [5.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:18.4 ft. [5.6 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1985
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:50 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:69.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$162,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
December 2018FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5069.9
December 2016FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5069.9
December 2014FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5069.9
December 2012FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3570.0
March 2011FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3570.0
February 2009FairGoodGoodSatisfactory3570.0
March 2007GoodGoodGoodGood3570.0
February 2005GoodGoodGoodGood3570.0
April 2003GoodGoodGoodGood3570.0
January 2001GoodGoodGoodGood3570.0
January 1999GoodVery GoodGoodGood3570.0
November 1991GoodExcellentVery GoodVery Good3552.1