COUNTY RD 531 over SCHOOL HOLLOW BR
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+38.31544, -91.9600038°18'56" N, 91°57'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY RD 531 over SCHOOL HOLLOW BR |
Structure number: | 18278 |
Old structure number: | 1800005 076 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 7 T 41 N R 9 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Total length: | 53.2 ft. [16.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1935 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 30 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 28.2 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $249,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2017 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 30 | 28.2 |
May 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 30 | 45.0 |
April 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 51.2 |
May 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 51.2 |
May 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 51.2 |
May 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 51.2 |
June 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 51.2 |
May 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 51.2 |
March 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 53.2 |
May 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 53.2 |
March 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 99 | 47.3 |