+39.25943, -92.38906
39°15'34" N, 92°23'21" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:COUNTY RD 2950 over SUGAR CR
Structure number:22155
Old structure number:34200141 088 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 32 T 52 N R 13 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.3 ft. [7.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.6 ft. [7.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1998
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:35 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:100.0

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
December 2018Good8 out of 1035100.0
December 2016Good8 out of 1035100.0
December 2014Good8 out of 1035100.0
December 2012Good8 out of 1035100.0
February 2011Good8 out of 1035100.0
February 2009Good8 out of 1035100.0
March 2007Good8 out of 1035100.0
February 2005Good8 out of 1035100.0
April 2003Good8 out of 1035100.0
January 2001Good8 out of 1035100.0
January 1999Good8 out of 1035100.0
February 1997Good8 out of 1015100.0
February 1995Good9 out of 101597.0
March 1993Good9 out of 101597.0
December 1991Good9 out of 103097.0