Share: 
KINGS LAKE RD928 over KINGS LAKE
Map
Coordinates:
+39.07369, -90.72903
39°04'25" N, 90°43'45" W
+39.07369, -90.72903
39°04'25" N, 90°43'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | KINGS LAKE RD928 over KINGS LAKE |
| Structure number: | 22271 |
| Old structure number: | 3480008 057 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | S 1817 T 50 N R 2 E |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 48.9 ft. [14.9 m] |
| Total length: | 50.9 ft. [15.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1975 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 35 [as of 2017] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 66.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $162,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 35 | 66.9 |
| December 2016 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 78.0 |
| December 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 78.0 |
| December 2012 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 78.0 |
| December 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 78.0 |
| December 2008 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 78.0 |
| November 2006 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 78.0 |
| November 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 77.6 |
| October 2002 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 77.6 |
| November 2000 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 77.6 |
| October 1998 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 77.3 |
| November 1990 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 76.3 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1282245
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1282245