Share:

COUNTY RD 239 over BRANCH

Map

Coordinates:
+39.64889, -92.05458
39°38'56" N, 92°03'16" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:COUNTY RD 239 over BRANCH
Structure number:24820
Old structure number:55800101 069 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 17 T 56 N R 10 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Total length:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1987
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:58.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$104,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
May 2018GoodGoodGoodGood2058.5
May 2016GoodGoodGoodGood2058.5
May 2014GoodGoodGoodGood3058.5
May 2012GoodGoodGoodGood3061.5
July 2010GoodGoodGoodGood3061.5
July 2008GoodGoodGoodGood3061.5
June 2006GoodGoodGoodGood3061.5
June 2004GoodGoodGoodGood3061.5
June 2002GoodGoodGoodGood3061.5
June 2000GoodGoodGoodGood3061.5
June 1998GoodGoodGoodGood3061.5
January 1997GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood1560.5
December 1994FairVery GoodGoodSatisfactory1565.4
December 1992FairVery GoodGoodFair3550.4
February 1991FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3560.4