MO 49 S over MCKENZIE CR
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+37.22592, -90.7148637°13'33" N, 90°42'53" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | MO 49 S over MCKENZIE CR |
Structure number: | 5163 |
Old structure number: | H 899 1 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 3 T 29 N R 3 E |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
Total length: | 94.2 ft. [28.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 39° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1929 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2015
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,394 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 12% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 6.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $652,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2015 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Satisfactory | 1394 | 6.0 |
October 2013 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Satisfactory | 1346 | 12.3 |
December 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 1756 | 27.3 |
December 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 1648 | 29.2 |
October 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2028 | 40.5 |
October 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2100 | 40.0 |
December 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2310 | 38.7 |
February 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2290 | 38.8 |
November 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2228 | 39.2 |
December 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2200 | 37.9 |
December 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2200 | 37.9 |
December 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2200 | 37.9 |
January 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1905 | 39.8 |
December 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1905 | 39.9 |
November 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2055 | 38.9 |
November 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1987 | 39.3 |
January 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 1987 | 39.3 |
November 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 1894 | 40.0 |