Share:

RT M E over LOCUST CR

Map

Coordinates:
+40.35701, -93.05429
40°21'25" N, 93°03'15" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RT M E over LOCUST CR
Structure number:7442
Old structure number:P 13 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 8 T 64 N R 19 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:31.2 ft. [9.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:87 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:20% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:92.6

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
August 2017Good7 out of 108792.6
August 2015Good7 out of 107692.6
September 2013Good7 out of 107692.6
November 2011Good7 out of 107673.9
November 2009Good7 out of 107073.9
January 2008Good7 out of 1011460.8
September 2005Good7 out of 1011460.8
February 2004Good7 out of 1011860.7
September 2001Good7 out of 1011060.8
October 1999Good7 out of 1013460.7
November 1997Good7 out of 1013460.7
November 1995Good7 out of 1011660.2
December 1993Good7 out of 106473.9
October 1991Good7 out of 106066.2