Share:

RT AA E over BEE CR

Map

Coordinates:
+39.41309, -92.04750
39°24'47" N, 92°02'51" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RT AA E over BEE CR
Structure number:7918
Old structure number:P 826 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 5 T 53 N R 10 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Total length:163.1 ft. [49.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.3 ft. [6.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:176 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:41.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$921,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
October 2018PoorSeriousFairFair17641.3
October 2016PoorSeriousFairFair17041.4
October 2014PoorSeriousFairFair9942.7
October 2013PoorSeriousFairFair17441.4
October 2012PoorSeriousFairFair18641.3
December 2011PoorPoorFairFair18643.4
December 2010PoorPoorSatisfactoryFair19843.3
December 2009PoorPoorSatisfactoryFair20243.3
October 2008PoorPoorSatisfactoryFair20443.3
January 2008PoorPoorSatisfactoryFair21643.2
November 2005FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory21853.5
November 2003FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20653.5
October 2002FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20853.5
December 2001FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory23653.4
November 2000FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19042.8
November 1999FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory18442.8
February 1999FairSatisfactoryGoodGood18442.8
October 1997FairSatisfactoryGoodGood18442.8
January 1997FairSatisfactoryGoodGood22242.7
January 1996FairSatisfactoryGoodGood22241.1
November 1994FairSatisfactoryGoodGood21241.2
December 1993FairSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good20841.2
November 1992FairSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good20841.2
December 1991FairSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good19041.3