RT NN E over PLATTE RVR
Map
Coordinates:
+40.44487, -94.6328240°26'42" N, 94°37'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RT NN E over PLATTE RVR |
Structure number: | 8017 |
Old structure number: | P 981 1 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 8 T 65 N R 33 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 101.1 ft. [30.8 m] |
Total length: | 268.1 ft. [81.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1955 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 67 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 12% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 52.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $960,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Fair | 67 | 52.5 |
October 2016 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Fair | 234 | 48.0 |
December 2014 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Fair | 44 | 62.3 |
September 2013 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Fair | 44 | 62.3 |
December 2012 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Fair | 44 | 62.3 |
January 2012 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Fair | 44 | 62.3 |
October 2010 | Poor | Serious | Satisfactory | Fair | 86 | 62.8 |
September 2009 | Poor | Serious | Satisfactory | Fair | 88 | 62.8 |
November 2008 | Poor | Serious | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 88 | 73.9 |
October 2007 | Poor | Serious | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 62 | 73.9 |
November 2006 | Poor | Serious | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 62 | 73.9 |
October 2005 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 182 | 62.1 |
October 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 184 | 65.1 |
September 2001 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 186 | 65.1 |
October 1999 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 175 | 64.4 |
October 1998 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 175 | 64.4 |
November 1997 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 175 | 64.4 |
October 1996 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 277 | 62.6 |
November 1995 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 277 | 62.6 |
November 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 265 | 62.7 |
October 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 261 | 62.7 |
October 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 261 | 62.7 |
December 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 246 | 62.7 |