Share:

RT A S over MID FK SALT RVR

Map

Coordinates:
+39.52534, -92.12786
39°31'31" N, 92°07'40" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RT A S over MID FK SALT RVR
Structure number:8378
Old structure number:R 468 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 27 T 55 N R 11 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Total length:353.0 ft. [107.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Year reconstructed:2011
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:267 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:56.9

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
October 2018FairVery GoodFairGood26756.9
October 2016FairExcellentFairGood26556.9
October 2014GoodExcellentVery GoodGood35466.9
January 2013GoodExcellentVery GoodGood34666.9
October 2012GoodExcellentVery GoodGood34666.9
December 2011FairExcellentSatisfactoryGood35466.9
December 2010PoorPoorFairGood37645.6
December 2009PoorPoorFairGood38445.6
October 2008PoorPoorFairGood38445.6
November 2007PoorPoorFairGood42444.4
November 2006PoorPoorFairGood42244.4
November 2005PoorPoorFairGood42244.4
November 2004PoorPoorFairGood39245.6
November 2003PoorPoorFairGood39445.5
October 2002PoorPoorFairGood40045.5
December 2001PoorPoorFairGood34845.7
July 2000PoorPoorFairGood34244.9
November 1999PoorPoorFairGood33244.9
February 1999PoorPoorFairGood33244.9
October 1997PoorPoorFairGood33244.9
January 1997PoorPoorFairGood35444.8
January 1996PoorPoorPoorGood35427.2
November 1994PoorPoorPoorGood33827.4
December 1993PoorPoorPoorGood33227.4
November 1992PoorPoorPoorGood33227.4
November 1991PoorPoorPoorVery Good31727.6