Share: 
RT H E over BRUSHY CR
Map
Coordinates:
+39.03360, -93.09576
39°02'01" N, 93°05'45" W
+39.03360, -93.09576
39°02'01" N, 93°05'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | RT H E over BRUSHY CR |
| Structure number: | 8578 |
| Old structure number: | S 67R 1 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | S 10 T 49 N R 20 W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Skew angle: | 20° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1930 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 684 [as of 2016] |
| Truck traffic: | 11% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 68.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $255,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2017 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 684 | 68.0 |
| December 2015 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 672 | 68.0 |
| December 2013 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 672 | 68.0 |
| December 2011 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 636 | 46.6 |
| September 2010 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 662 | 46.5 |
| October 2008 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 684 | 46.4 |
| September 2006 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 612 | 46.7 |
| December 2004 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 670 | 46.4 |
| October 2002 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 782 | 45.9 |
| January 2001 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 774 | 46.0 |
| December 1998 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 751 | 46.1 |
| October 1996 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 752 | 46.1 |
| November 1994 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 510 | 47.2 |
| September 1992 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 501 | 58.1 |
| October 1990 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 472 | 35.1 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1295389
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1295389