Share:

RT E S over KINGS CR

Map

Coordinates:
+36.63748, -94.19516
36°38'15" N, 94°11'43" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RT E S over KINGS CR
Structure number:8591
Old structure number:S 121 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 8 T 22 N R 30 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Total length:105.0 ft. [32.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:1,506 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:11% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:14.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$704,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
October 2018FairFairFairFair150614.3
October 2016FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair210017.3
October 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair119017.3
November 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair129417.3
December 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair129417.3
January 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair137617.5
December 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair136217.5
January 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair140617.5
October 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair179617.5
January 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair178417.5
January 2006FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair143017.5
October 2004FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair145217.5
November 2003FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair145817.5
November 2002FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair139617.5
January 2002FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair140417.5
October 2000FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair120017.3
November 1999FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair116517.3
October 1998FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair116517.3
October 1997FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair116517.3
November 1995FairSatisfactoryGoodFair107317.3
January 1995FairSatisfactoryGoodFair112217.3
December 1993FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory110331.4
November 1992FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory110331.4
November 1991FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory104032.1