MO 64A E over SPRING CR
Map
Coordinates:
+37.72387, -92.8555137°43'26" N, 92°51'20" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | MO 64A E over SPRING CR |
Structure number: | 9124 |
Old structure number: | T 408 1 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 31 T 34 N R 17 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 41.0 ft. [12.5 m] |
Total length: | 128.9 ft. [39.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1934 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 461 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 11% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 54.2 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $571,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 461 | 54.2 |
August 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 456 | 54.2 |
September 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 452 | 54.2 |
September 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 865 | 54.0 |
October 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1131 | 54.6 |
October 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 658 | 54.8 |
November 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1120 | 54.6 |
October 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1144 | 54.6 |
November 2001 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1166 | 54.5 |
November 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1105 | 53.9 |
November 1999 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1147 | 53.9 |
October 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1147 | 53.9 |
November 1997 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1147 | 53.9 |
December 1996 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 941 | 54.0 |
October 1995 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 941 | 54.0 |
December 1994 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 782 | 54.1 |
November 1993 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 769 | 54.1 |
October 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 769 | 55.1 |
December 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 725 | 55.1 |