RT T S over BEAR CR
Map
Coordinates:
+37.79530, -92.4904837°47'43" N, 92°29'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RT T S over BEAR CR |
Structure number: | 9670 |
Old structure number: | X 440 1 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 5 T 35 N R 14 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 52.5 ft. [16.0 m] |
Total length: | 148.0 ft. [45.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1938 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,358 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 12% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 35.3 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $939,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1358 | 35.3 |
August 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1004 | 36.8 |
September 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 998 | 39.2 |
September 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1162 | 36.2 |
October 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1064 | 37.8 |
October 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1310 | 36.8 |
December 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1224 | 37.1 |
October 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1322 | 36.7 |
November 2001 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1424 | 36.3 |
November 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 767 | 40.1 |
September 1999 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 744 | 41.9 |
November 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 744 | 41.9 |
October 1997 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 744 | 41.9 |
December 1996 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 560 | 42.6 |
November 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 560 | 49.6 |
October 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 535 | 49.7 |
November 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 576 | 49.6 |
October 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 576 | 49.6 |
December 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 543 | 49.7 |