STUCKEY BRIDGE RD over CHUNKY RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+32.25579, -88.8552532°15'21" N, 88°51'19" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | STUCKEY BRIDGE RD over CHUNKY RIVER |
Structure number: | SA3800000000024 |
Location: | SEC 22 T 5N R14E B |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 109.9 ft. [33.5 m] |
Total length: | 199.2 ft. [60.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 12.8 ft. [3.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1901 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
Average daily traffic: | 110 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 11.7 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $650,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 110 | 11.7 |
September 2016 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 110 | 11.7 |
September 2015 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 110 | 11.7 |
September 2014 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 110 | 11.7 |
September 2013 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 110 | 11.7 |
September 2012 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 110 | 11.7 |
December 2011 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Serious | 110 | 11.7 |
November 2010 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Critical | 110 | 11.7 |
October 2009 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Critical | 110 | 11.7 |
October 2008 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Critical | 110 | 11.7 |
October 2007 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Critical | 110 | 11.7 |
February 2007 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Critical | 110 | 11.7 |
February 2006 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Critical | 110 | 11.7 |
January 2005 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Critical | 110 | 11.7 |
February 2004 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Critical | 110 | 11.7 |
February 2002 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Critical | 110 | 11.7 |
January 2000 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Critical | 110 | 11.7 |
March 1998 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Critical | 110 | 11.7 |
May 1996 | Poor | Poor | Critical | Critical | 110 | 11.7 |