RED LODGE CR RD over E RED LODGE CREEK 010
Map
Coordinates:
+45.30887, -109.3095945°18'32" N, 109°18'35" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RED LODGE CR RD over E RED LODGE CREEK 010 |
Structure number: | L05002007+04001 |
Location: | 8M W ROBERTS |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.6 ft. [7.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1970 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2003] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2017 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 98.9 |
November 2015 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 98.9 |
November 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 99.9 |
November 2011 | Poor | Good | Good | Serious | 100 | 55.9 |
November 2009 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 98.9 |
November 2007 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 98.9 |
December 2005 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 98.9 |
November 2003 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 98.9 |
February 2002 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 98.9 |
April 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 99.9 |
May 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 99.9 |
January 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 252 | 56.3 |
February 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 252 | 59.0 |
January 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 252 | 57.0 |
December 1989 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 252 | 59.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 203 | 203 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 667 | 667 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 92 | 91 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 52 | 49 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 130 | 123 | 7 | 0 | 0 |