CHANCE RD over CLARKS FK YELLOWSTNE 006
Map
Coordinates:
+45.01181, -109.0620945°00'43" N, 109°03'44" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CHANCE RD over CLARKS FK YELLOWSTNE 006 |
Structure number: | L05129001+05001 |
Location: | 9M S BELFRY |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 199.8 ft. [60.9 m] |
Total length: | 202.8 ft. [61.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.4 ft. [4.4 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1946 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2003] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 21.5 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $455,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2017 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 100 | 21.5 |
April 2015 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 100 | 25.8 |
April 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 100 | 30.8 |
April 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 100 | 30.8 |
April 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 100 | 30.8 |
April 2007 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 40.9 |
September 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 40.9 |
September 2004 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 40.9 |
February 2003 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 39.9 |
May 2001 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 39.9 |
January 1999 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 39.9 |
March 1997 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 39.9 |
May 1995 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 31 | 39.8 |
October 1992 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 31 | 44.2 |
February 1991 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 31 | 44.2 |