ISMAY RD over O`FALLON CREEK 002
Map
Coordinates:
+46.10511, -104.7509146°06'18" N, 104°45'03" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | ISMAY RD over O`FALLON CREEK 002 |
Structure number: | L06007006+08001 |
Location: | 20M NW EKALAKA |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 70.9 ft. [21.6 m] |
Total length: | 73.2 ft. [22.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 20° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1994 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2001] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 99.6 |
August 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 99.6 |
September 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 99.6 |
October 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 99.6 |
November 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 99.6 |
November 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 99.6 |
January 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 99.6 |
November 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 31 | 99.8 |
December 1993 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 31 | 99.8 |
February 1992 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Serious | 31 | 21.4 |
February 1990 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 31 | 22.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 285 | 285 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 1,927 | 1,927 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 75 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Fixed Bearing | each | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 174 | 174 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 435 | 435 | 0 | 0 | 0 |