Share: 
ISMAY RD over O`FALLON CREEK 002
Map
Coordinates:
+46.10511, -104.75091
46°06'18" N, 104°45'03" W
+46.10511, -104.75091
46°06'18" N, 104°45'03" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | ISMAY RD over O`FALLON CREEK 002 |
| Structure number: | L06007006+08001 |
| Location: | 20M NW EKALAKA |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 70.9 ft. [21.6 m] |
| Total length: | 73.2 ft. [22.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
| Skew angle: | 20° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1994 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2001] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 99.6 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 99.6 |
| August 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 99.6 |
| September 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 99.6 |
| October 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 99.6 |
| November 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 99.6 |
| November 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 99.6 |
| January 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 99.6 |
| November 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 31 | 99.8 |
| December 1993 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 31 | 99.8 |
| February 1992 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Serious | 31 | 21.4 |
| February 1990 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 31 | 22.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superstructure | ||||||
| Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 285 | 285 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 1,927 | 1,927 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 75 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bearings | ||||||
| Fixed Bearing | each | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 174 | 174 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 435 | 435 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1315751
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1315751