MILL IRON CAMP CRO over BOX ELDER CREEK 006
Map
Coordinates:
+45.83918, -104.1689645°50'21" N, 104°10'08" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | MILL IRON CAMP CRO over BOX ELDER CREEK 006 |
Structure number: | L06100019+00001 |
Location: | 2M SE MILL IRON |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
Total length: | 226.7 ft. [69.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 62 [as of 2016] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 84.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 62 | 84.6 |
August 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 84.3 |
August 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 84.3 |
September 2009 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 84.3 |
September 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 84.3 |
February 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 84.3 |
November 1999 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 84.3 |
February 1998 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 84.3 |
November 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 96 | 82.2 |
October 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 96 | 82.2 |
February 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 252 | 86.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 879 | 879 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 7,029 | 0 | 7,029 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 92 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 92 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Assembly without Seal Joint | linear ft. | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 453 | 453 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,133 | 1,076 | 57 | 0 | 0 |