DRY FORK RD over DRY FK MARIAS 051
Map
Coordinates:
+48.22101, -112.0055148°13'16" N, 112°00'20" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | DRY FORK RD over DRY FK MARIAS 051 |
Structure number: | L37001011+07001 |
Location: | 4M NW CONRAD |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 79.1 ft. [24.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1985 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2002] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 98.0 |
October 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 99.0 |
November 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 100.0 |
November 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 100.0 |
November 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 99.0 |
November 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 99.0 |
November 2006 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 99.0 |
November 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 98.0 |
October 2002 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 98.0 |
May 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 98.9 |
May 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 93.9 |
April 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 93.9 |
December 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 96 | 93.9 |
February 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 96 | 93.9 |
February 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 96 | 93.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 118 | 112 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
Steel Pile | each | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 236 | 92 | 72 | 24 | 48 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 56 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 220 | 207 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 568 | 555 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 2,207 | 2,207 | 0 | 0 | 0 |