DRY FORK RD over SPRING CREEK 050
Map
Coordinates:
+48.21518, -112.0054748°12'55" N, 112°00'20" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | DRY FORK RD over SPRING CREEK 050 |
Structure number: | L37001012+01001 |
Location: | 4M N CONRAD |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.5 ft. [8.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1987 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2004] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 98.0 |
November 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 100.0 |
December 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 100.0 |
December 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 100.0 |
December 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 100.0 |
December 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 98.0 |
January 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 100 | 98.0 |
February 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 98.0 |
November 2001 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 97.9 |
January 2000 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 99.9 |
May 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 99.9 |
February 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 96 | 99.9 |
October 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 96 | 99.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 82 | 0 | 82 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 410 | 82 | 164 | 82 | 82 |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 243 | 241 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 775 | 775 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Steel Column | each | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 700 | 140 | 280 | 140 | 140 |
Steel Abutment | linear ft. | 135 | 135 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,620 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pier Cap | linear ft. | 56 | 0 | 56 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 280 | 56 | 112 | 56 | 56 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 52 | 42 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 124 | 114 | 0 | 5 | 5 |