US 310 over ROCK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+45.51785, -108.8625845°31'04" N, 108°51'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 310 over ROCK CREEK |
Structure number: | P00004042+04541 |
Location: | ROCKVALE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 44.9 ft. [13.7 m] |
Total length: | 137.1 ft. [41.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.3 ft. [12.9 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1934 |
Year reconstructed: | 1968 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 4,323 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 88.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4323 | 88.9 |
October 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4420 | 57.7 |
October 2014 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4030 | 57.7 |
October 2012 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4030 | 57.7 |
October 2010 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4030 | 57.7 |
October 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 3950 | 57.7 |
October 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 4420 | 57.7 |
November 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3900 | 57.7 |
December 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3330 | 54.7 |
April 2001 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 3330 | 54.7 |
January 1999 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 3030 | 54.7 |
December 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 2886 | 54.7 |
March 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2886 | 57.5 |
December 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2922 | 64.6 |
February 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2889 | 64.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 958 | 843 | 115 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 5,791 | 5,617 | 174 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 5,791 | 5,559 | 232 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 92 | 38 | 54 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 79 | 75 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 7 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 14 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 21 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 6 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 276 | 265 | 11 | 0 | 0 |