US 212 over THOMPSON CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+45.04870, -104.4516745°02'55" N, 104°27'06" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 212 over THOMPSON CREEK |
Structure number: | P00023134+04021 |
Location: | 3M NW ALZADA |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 50.9 ft. [15.5 m] |
Total length: | 102.7 ft. [31.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 38.4 ft. [11.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 40.4 ft. [12.3 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,637 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 44% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 80.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1637 | 80.0 |
September 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1310 | 82.7 |
September 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1310 | 82.8 |
September 2011 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1310 | 82.8 |
September 2009 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1520 | 80.8 |
January 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 2550 | 79.0 |
October 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 2550 | 79.0 |
November 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1060 | 83.1 |
February 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1130 | 82.5 |
June 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 863 | 86.6 |
January 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 803 | 87.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 499 | 499 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 4,155 | 4,155 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 4,155 | 4,113 | 0 | 0 | 42 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 98 | 98 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 39 | 19 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Fixed Bearing | each | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 207 | 41 | 166 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 518 | 104 | 414 | 0 | 0 |