US 212 FH 59 over ROCK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+45.08679, -109.3667345°05'12" N, 109°22'00" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 212 FH 59 over ROCK CREEK |
Structure number: | P00028059+04791 |
Location: | 8M SW RED LODGE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Total length: | 136.2 ft. [41.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 654 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 87.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 654 | 87.9 |
March 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 770 | 83.7 |
March 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 770 | 83.7 |
March 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 770 | 83.7 |
March 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 430 | 91.0 |
March 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1040 | 80.0 |
November 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 840 | 83.1 |
December 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 657 | 88.9 |
October 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 660 | 88.1 |
February 1991 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 688 | 87.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 689 | 689 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 4,768 | 3,338 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
Concrete Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 4,768 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,768 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 82 | 74 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 69 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 276 | 276 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 690 | 690 | 0 | 0 | 0 |