HAMMOND RD over WHITETAIL CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+45.40214, -104.6220645°24'08" N, 104°37'19" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HAMMOND RD over WHITETAIL CREEK |
Structure number: | S00277020+09001 |
Location: | 21M NE HAMMOND |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 99.1 ft. [30.2 m] |
Total length: | 101.7 ft. [31.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.5 ft. [8.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2010 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 43 [as of 2016] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 92.5 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $50,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 43 | 92.5 |
August 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 70 | 92.4 |
August 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 70 | 92.4 |
September 2011 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 70 | 92.4 |
February 2011 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 70 | 92.4 |
September 2009 | - | - | - | - | 70 | 29.1 |
September 2007 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 50 | 58.4 |
October 2005 | Poor | Very Good | Good | Serious | 50 | 42.3 |
February 2004 | Poor | Very Good | Good | Poor | 60 | 58.3 |
November 2001 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Fair | 60 | 74.4 |
November 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 60 | 85.4 |
February 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 60 | 85.4 |
November 1995 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 60 | 72.3 |
February 1994 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 70 | 72.2 |
February 1992 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 50 | 67.4 |
February 1990 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 31 | 77.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 499 | 499 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 3,089 | 3,089 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 85 | 84 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Bearings |
Fixed Bearing | each | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 200 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 500 | 0 | 500 | 0 | 0 |