HAMMOND RD over BOX ELDER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+45.49569, -104.4745845°29'44" N, 104°28'28" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HAMMOND RD over BOX ELDER CREEK |
Structure number: | S00277031+05001 |
Location: | 31M NE HAMMOND |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 47.6 ft. [14.5 m] |
Total length: | 141.7 ft. [43.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.2 ft. [9.5 m] |
Skew angle: | 12° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2000 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 45 [as of 2016] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 45 | 98.9 |
August 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 70 | 98.8 |
August 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 70 | 98.8 |
September 2011 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 70 | 98.8 |
September 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 93.8 |
September 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 93.8 |
March 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 60 | 93.8 |
November 2001 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 60 | 93.8 |
November 1999 | Poor | Good | Poor | Serious | 60 | 22.7 |
February 1998 | Poor | Good | Poor | Serious | 60 | 25.5 |
November 1995 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Serious | 60 | 19.7 |
February 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 42.3 |
February 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 49.4 |
February 1990 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 46 | 48.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 689 | 689 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 4,413 | 4,413 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Steel Column | each | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 452 | 0 | 294 | 45 | 113 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 82 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 59 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Fixed Bearing | each | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 305 | 305 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 763 | 763 | 0 | 0 | 0 |