+35.13654, -80.27646
35°08'12" N, 80°16'35" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SR1454 over PINE LOG CREEK
Structure number:000000000070197
Old structure number:000000000007197 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.9 MI. W. JCT. NC742
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:39.0 ft. [11.9 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1992
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:90 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:99.0

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
January 2018Good7 out of 109099.0
January 2016Good7 out of 107099.0
January 2014Good7 out of 107099.0
April 2012Good7 out of 109099.0
April 2010Good8 out of 1070100.0
August 2008Good8 out of 1070100.0
July 2006Good8 out of 1080100.0
May 2004Good8 out of 1070100.0
June 2002Good8 out of 1070100.0
July 2000Good8 out of 1070100.0
July 1998Good8 out of 10100100.0
August 1996Good8 out of 10100100.0
July 1994Good9 out of 1090100.0
July 1992Good8 out of 1050100.0
April 1991PoorN out of 106026.5