US52 NC742 over CSX RAILROAD
Map
Coordinates:
+34.98050, -80.0907834°58'50" N, 80°05'27" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US52 NC742 over CSX RAILROAD |
Structure number: | 000000000070323 |
Location: | 0.15 MI. N. JCT. US742 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over railroad |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 51.8 ft. [15.8 m] |
Total length: | 130.9 ft. [39.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 51.8 ft. [15.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 25° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1993 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 4,800 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 14% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4800 | 99.0 |
June 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4300 | 99.0 |
July 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4300 | 99.0 |
July 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5800 | 98.9 |
July 2009 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5900 | 98.7 |
August 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5900 | 98.7 |
September 2005 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5500 | 99.0 |
June 2003 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5800 | 100.0 |
August 2001 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5100 | 100.0 |
June 1999 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 4700 | 100.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 896 | 896 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 7,239 | 2,999 | 4,240 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 160 | 160 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pile | each | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 254 | 254 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concrete Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 3,138 | 3,138 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 122 | 0 | 122 | 0 | 0 |
Assembly with Seal | each | 122 | 0 | 122 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 42 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 246 | 246 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 266 | 260 | 6 | 0 | 0 |