Share:

ASH STREET over NORTH TOE RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+36.08383, -81.92786
36°05'02" N, 81°55'40" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:ASH STREET over NORTH TOE RIVER
Structure number:000000000110163
Location:.05 MI.E.JCT.NC194
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Total length:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.6 ft. [7.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.6 ft. [7.8 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:1,000 [as of 1994]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:56.4
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2018FairFairFairSatisfactory100056.4
June 2016FairFairFairSatisfactory100053.3
May 2014FairFairFairGood100049.0
May 2012FairFairFairGood100047.8
June 2010FairFairSatisfactoryGood100057.6
June 2008FairFairSatisfactoryGood100057.6
June 2006FairFairSatisfactoryGood100057.6
June 2004FairFairSatisfactoryGood100058.6
May 2002GoodGoodGoodGood100059.6
June 2000GoodGoodGoodGood100059.6
May 1998GoodGoodGoodGood100059.6
June 1990FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood100046.7