ASH STREET over NORTH TOE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+36.08383, -81.9278636°05'02" N, 81°55'40" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | ASH STREET over NORTH TOE RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000110163 |
Location: | .05 MI.E.JCT.NC194 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.6 ft. [7.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1983 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,000 [as of 1994] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 56.4 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1000 | 56.4 |
June 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1000 | 53.3 |
May 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 1000 | 49.0 |
May 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 1000 | 47.8 |
June 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 1000 | 57.6 |
June 2008 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 1000 | 57.6 |
June 2006 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 1000 | 57.6 |
June 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 1000 | 58.6 |
May 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1000 | 59.6 |
June 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1000 | 59.6 |
May 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1000 | 59.6 |
June 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1000 | 46.7 |