SR1524 over MILL TIMBER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+36.02128, -81.9201636°01'17" N, 81°55'13" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1524 over MILL TIMBER CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000110176 |
Location: | 100 FT.N.JCT.US221 NC94 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 8.9 ft. [2.7 m] |
Total length: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 45° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1960 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 120 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Culvert condition: | Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 44.5 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 120 | 44.5 |
June 2015 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 120 | 73.0 |
June 2013 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 120 | 89.0 |
June 2011 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 80 | 89.0 |
June 2009 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 80 | 89.0 |
June 2007 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 110 | 89.0 |
June 2005 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 130 | 89.0 |
May 2003 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 120 | 100.0 |
July 2001 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 120 | 100.0 |
June 1999 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 70 | 89.0 |