NC92 over BACK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.47156, -76.8041935°28'18" N, 76°48'15" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NC92 over BACK CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000130045 |
Old structure number: | 000000000013045 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 0.5 MI S. OF JCT SR1741 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Total length: | 631.9 ft. [192.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1983 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 14 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,500 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 69.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3500 | 69.5 |
June 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3500 | 68.5 |
June 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3400 | 68.6 |
June 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3600 | 68.4 |
June 2010 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 3000 | 52.0 |
August 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 3400 | 68.6 |
July 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4300 | 80.5 |
April 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 3600 | 69.5 |
August 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 4100 | 78.3 |
June 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3600 | 80.1 |
June 1998 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 3700 | 69.4 |
August 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3500 | 80.9 |
July 1994 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 2900 | 70.1 |
June 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2600 | 89.2 |
June 1990 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 3200 | 81.2 |