US17 over GUM SWAMP

Map

Coordinates:
+35.67856, -77.07967
35°40'43" N, 77°04'47" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	US17 over GUM SWAMP
Structure number:	000000000130056
Old structure number:	000000000013056 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	3.2 MI N JCT NC171
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) `[02]`
Length of largest span:	21.0 ft. `[6.4 m]`
Total length:	22.0 ft. `[6.7 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	31.5 ft. `[9.6 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	35.8 ft. `[10.9 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1921
Year reconstructed:	1939
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 9 / H 10 `[1]`
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Concrete continuous `[2]`
Main spans design:	Slab `[01]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Open, would be posted or closed except for temporary shoring `[D]`
Average daily traffic:	5,900 `[as of 2013]`
Truck traffic:	14% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Pier/abutment protection:	Navigation protection not required `[1]`
Scour condition:	Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. `[U]`
Sufficiency rating:	47.5
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
May 2018	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	5900	47.5
May 2016	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	5900	29.9
May 2014	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	5700	30.1
May 2012	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	5900	29.9
May 2010	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	5600	78.1
April 2008	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	5600	78.1
March 2006	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	5000	72.7
March 2004	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	5100	53.9
March 2002	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	5400	53.7
March 2000	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	5100	53.9
March 1998	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	4800	63.1
March 1996	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	4900	78.1
March 1994	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	3600	86.2
March 1992	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	4000	76.7
March 1990	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	3800	86.9

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	88	0	84	0	4
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	636	0	0	612	24
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	742	0	737	5	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	756	0	754	2	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	70	0	70	0	0
Steel Pile	each	4	0	4	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	120	0	0	120	0
Steel Pier Cap	linear ft.	16	0	16	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	96	0	0	96	0
Bearings
Other Bearing	each	8	8	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Other Material Bridge Rail	linear ft.	44	42	2	0	0