SR1128 over BRANCH ROANOKE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+36.09063, -77.2794136°05'26" N, 77°16'46" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1128 over BRANCH ROANOKE RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000150147 |
Old structure number: | 000000000015147 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 3.3 MI.W.JCT.SR1130 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 54.1 ft. [16.5 m] |
Total length: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2000 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 300 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 79.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Very Good | 300 | 79.5 |
June 2016 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 300 | 78.4 |
June 2014 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 300 | 78.4 |
June 2012 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 500 | 49.9 |
June 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 500 | 61.5 |
July 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 500 | 49.1 |
July 2006 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 500 | 45.4 |
June 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 500 | 53.1 |
August 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 500 | 53.1 |
December 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 430 | 54.2 |
August 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 380 | 14.2 |
September 1996 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 80 | 44.1 |
August 1994 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 110 | 9.4 |
August 1992 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 110 | 24.3 |
May 1990 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 300 | 26.0 |