NC11 over CAPE FEAR RIVER OVERFLOW
Map
Coordinates:
+34.40258, -78.2654434°24'09" N, 78°15'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NC11 over CAPE FEAR RIVER OVERFLOW |
Structure number: | 000000000170018 |
Old structure number: | 000000000017018 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 1.9 MI.N.JCT.NC87 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 73.2 ft. [22.3 m] |
Total length: | 375.0 ft. [114.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 31.8 ft. [9.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2015 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,500 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 86.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3500 | 86.2 |
February 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3500 | 86.2 |
June 2015 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 3500 | 6.0 |
June 2013 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 3600 | 6.0 |
June 2011 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 3300 | 6.0 |
June 2009 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 3200 | 6.0 |
February 2008 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 3300 | 6.0 |
August 2006 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 3300 | 6.0 |
April 2004 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 3300 | 4.0 |
April 2002 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 1900 | 9.8 |
April 2000 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 3000 | 4.0 |
February 1998 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 3800 | 31.9 |
February 1996 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 1400 | 51.1 |
December 1993 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 1400 | 51.1 |
December 1991 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Satisfactory | 2200 | 48.3 |