NC32 over DILLARD CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+36.24388, -76.6550036°14'38" N, 76°39'18" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NC32 over DILLARD CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000410020 |
Location: | 0.3 MI. S. JCT. SR1230. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 6.9 ft. [2.1 m] |
Total length: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1922 |
Year reconstructed: | 1952 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Number of main spans: | 8 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,600 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 46.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2600 | 46.5 |
November 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 2400 | 47.8 |
November 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 2400 | 47.8 |
November 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 2400 | 47.8 |
November 2010 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 2400 | 18.6 |
November 2008 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 2600 | 16.3 |
January 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2700 | 38.9 |
November 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2700 | 38.9 |
December 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2800 | 35.7 |
December 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2800 | 35.7 |
January 1999 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1900 | 43.1 |
December 1990 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2500 | 48.9 |