NC615 FERRY over CURRITUCK SOUND
Map
Coordinates:
+36.48364, -75.9267436°29'01" N, 75°55'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NC615 FERRY over CURRITUCK SOUND |
Structure number: | 000000000530019 |
Location: | S.END OF NC615 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 51.8 ft. [15.8 m] |
Total length: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2005 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Girder and floorbeam system [03] |
Deck type: | Steel plate (includes orthotropic) [5] |
Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 850 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 49.2 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 850 | 49.2 |
March 2015 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 970 | 53.0 |
March 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 970 | 53.0 |
March 2011 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 870 | 54.2 |
March 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 960 | 63.5 |
January 2007 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 850 | 63.2 |
December 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 890 | 34.3 |
December 2002 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 890 | 34.3 |
January 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 800 | 35.3 |
March 1999 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 34.3 |
March 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 600 | 44.5 |