SR1621 over BAILEY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.97003, -80.4324035°58'12" N, 80°25'57" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR1621 over BAILEY CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000590025 |
Location: | 0.6 MI. N. JCT. SR1623 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
Total length: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1975 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Corrugated Steel [6] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 780 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 63.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 780 | 63.0 |
October 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 750 | 69.0 |
October 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 750 | 69.0 |
October 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 1000 | 63.0 |
October 2010 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 970 | 61.5 |
November 2008 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 930 | 61.5 |
November 2006 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 950 | 61.5 |
October 2004 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 950 | 61.5 |
October 2002 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 550 | 67.5 |
November 2000 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 590 | 67.5 |
November 1998 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 440 | 67.5 |
October 1990 | Poor | Very Good | Very Good | Poor | 400 | 49.0 |