SR1613 over CYPRESS CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+36.04112, -78.20938
36°02'28" N, 78°12'34" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	SR1613 over CYPRESS CREEK
Structure number:	000000000690069
Old structure number:	000000000069069 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	0.3 MI W JCT SR1002
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	44.0 ft. `[13.4 m]`
Total length:	118.1 ft. `[36.0 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	27.2 ft. `[8.3 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	30.2 ft. `[9.2 m]`
Skew angle:	30°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	2000
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 9 / H 10 `[1]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Prestressed concrete `[5]`
Main spans design:	Slab `[01]`
Deck type:	Concrete Precast Panels `[2]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	570 `[as of 2014]`
Truck traffic:	6% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Pier/abutment protection:	Navigation protection not required `[1]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	97.1

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
May 2017	Good	Good	Good	Good	570	97.1
May 2015	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	760	89.7
May 2013	Good	Good	Good	Good	760	89.7
May 2011	Good	Good	Good	Good	580	97.1
May 2009	Good	Good	Good	Very Good	580	97.1
July 2007	Good	Good	Good	Very Good	810	89.7
April 2005	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	580	97.1
May 2003	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	650	97.1
May 2001	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	840	88.4
August 2000	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	840	88.4
June 1998	Poor	Good	Good	Poor	500	28.8
May 1996	Poor	Good	Good	Poor	450	29.0
April 1994	Fair	Very Good	Good	Satisfactory	450	48.2
April 1992	Poor	Very Good	Good	Poor	400	25.9
April 1990	Fair	Very Good	Good	Fair	400	34.7